Democrats were told that the Capitol Police and the National Guard were preparing for potentially tens of thousands of armed protesters coming to Washington and were establishing rules of engagement for warfare.
We wouldn’t create a life support system on a space station where in order to receive oxygen, one would need to work to obtain it. Life support is life support. Dead people can’t work. So make sure people get oxygen so they can stay alive. Living people will do much more work than dead people.
This is the point. You have taken an orderly system balancing a whole lot of chaos and fucked with it. I don’t know how it’s going to explode, but I can promise you this. It’s going to explode.
This is precisely why we have elections, and why both sides accept the results. To keep the chaos at bay. The whole point is that you have a regular, ritual fight rather than fighting all the time. Once one side breaks ritual then you’re on the way to civil war. Once you break the rules then chaos ensues. What exactly happens? I don’t know. It’s chaos.
Even if a vaccine has trained your immune cells to kick the butt of any SARS-CoV-2 viruses they spot, they might not be able to neutralize the ones resting in your nose, on the other side of your mucous barriers. Those COVID-19 viruses wouldn’t hurt you, but they still might be able to replicate and shed — coughed back out of your nose and mouth and into the community, where they could encounter your unvaccinated friends and loved ones.
Keeping free time scarce means people pay a lot more for convenience, gratification, and any other relief they can buy. It keeps them watching television, and its commercials. It keeps them unambitious outside of work.
Vier-vijfde werken is de beste beslissing die ik ooit nam. Een beslissing in eerste instantie om meer in bijberoep te doen en om wat flexibeler te zijn voor de dochter. Maar mentaal is dat echt een gigantisch verschil. Ik leef meer dan ik werk. En hoewel ik minder verdien, hou ik meer over op het einde van de maand, zowel financieel als op andere vlakken.
I do not think my older family members understand the extent to which the content they encounter is tailored by algorithms to set their lizard brains on fire. Like the majority of their peers, as a 2019 survey showed, they probably don’t understand an algorithm is involved at all. They insist they do understand, but their behavior tells me they do not.
The greatest trick the ad tech industry has pulled is convincing the world that contextual relevance is somehow less effective than some secret algorithm fed with all our data that’s supposed to be able to practically read our minds and know us better than we know ourselves.
En een quote voor alle krantenwebsites van ons land:
It has led to the ludicrous situation of an ethical argument being made to allow surveillance and tracking! It goes like this: websites need advertising to survive; if you block the ads, then you are denying these sites revenue. That argument would make sense if we were talking about contextual advertising. But it makes no sense when it comes to behavioural advertising …unless you genuinely believe that online advertising has to be behavioural, which means that online advertising has to track you to be effective. Such a belief would be completely wrong.
Ashley Willans van Harvard Business School in een kort interview in de Campaigns & Elections Creative nieuwsbrief:
One of the types of time that goes missing in the work-from-home environment is the casual conversation. These spontaneous mechanisms are what drives innovation.
Hier heb ik de laatste weken echt serieus last van. Zowel op ’t werk, als communicatiemedewerker, maar zeker ook op politiek en persoonlijk vlak. Ik zit in een soort onderhoudsmodus: bordjes draaiende houden, zonder ook maar enige spark om na te denken over andere bordjes of zo.
Misschien moet ik maar weer afleveringen van Praat beginnen maken.
Every morning, I wake up to a fresh edition of the Times on my wall.
Prijzig, maar zalig idee.